Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai)T2·78 pts
- Under identical total budgets, collaborating specialists (max 35% alone) reached 70% accuracy, surpassing the median general agent by 12 points.
- A single specialist scoring only 19% lifted the combined system from 40% to 53%, showing that filling capability gaps is more cost-effective than optimizing monolithic performance.
- The approach excels in complex reasoning (GAIA) but performs worse at higher cost in web-search-dependent tasks (SealQA).