宝玉 (@dotey)T2·68 pts
- AI-generated proposals often feature dense terminology and seemingly complete logic but exceed the user's actual comprehension, creating a gap where 'those who can write don't understand, and those who understand can't write.'
- Reviewers fall into an efficiency trap of 'fast generation, slow verification,' spending excessive time identifying AI hallucinations or technical misuses without resolving underlying understanding gaps through single interactions.
- Juniors' roles devolve into 'human agents,' merely feeding reviewer feedback back to AI for regeneration, thereby losing opportunities for independent thinking and internalizing knowledge.