- Scores 31 on the Intelligence Index, up 18 points from Inkling Small and level with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
- Large agentic gains: AutomationBench-AA rises from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%
- Coding profile diverges: 25% on FrontierCode 2.0 beats Claude Sonnet 5.5, but 13% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 trails its 30%
- Currently proprietary with weights pending; if released, it would be the top open-weights model outside China
AI CURATED HOT STORY · 11/6/2026
Thinking Machines Releases Inkling 2 Small, Scoring 31 on Intelligence Index to Match Gemini 3.8 Flash
Thinking Machines has released its second-generation model, Inkling 2 Small, which scores 31 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1, an 18-point improvement over its predecessor and on par with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high), while surpassing Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6-Pro. The model uses a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 594B total parameters but only 17B activated, supports image input and variable reasoning intensity, balancing efficiency and performance.
Technically, Inkling 2 Small shows significant gains in agentic tasks: AutomationBench-AA jumps from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%, and HLE-Diamond from 12% to 29%. Coding ability is mixed: FrontierCode 2.0 scores 25% versus Claude Sonnet 5.5's 11%, but Terminal-Bench 4.0 is only 13% versus 30%. The model is initially available as closed weights via the Tinker platform, priced at $0.30/$1.00 per million input/output tokens and $0.03 for cached input. Officials plan to open full weights under Apache 2.0 next week after external safety testing and red-teaming.
If the open-weight promise is fulfilled, Inkling 2 Small will become the highest-scoring open-weight model outside China, significantly raising the capability ceiling for open models. Its sparse MoE design achieves high performance with very low activated parameters, offering a new option for efficient inference deployment, while the leap in agentic tasks reflects the effectiveness of large-scale unified reinforcement learning. This move could intensify competition between open and closed models, pushing the industry to balance efficiency and safety.
Hourly heat curve
2 fully observed hoursCoverage timeline
Total 3 reports · Latest first- Artificial AnalysisT1·72 pts
- Hacker News AIT2·78 pts
- Sparse MoE with 594B total and 17B active parameters, supporting image inputs and variable effort
- Scores 31 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, with gains from efficient pre-training and a large unified RL run
- Closed weights via Tinker initially, with full Apache 2.0 weights planned after external safety testing
- Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)T1·74 pts
- Scores 31 on the Intelligence Index, up 18 points from Inkling Small and level with Gemini 3.8 Flash (high), ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Large agentic gains: AutomationBench-AA rises from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%, and HLE-Diamond from 12% to 29%
- Coding profile differs from Claude Sonnet 5.5: 25% vs 11% on FrontierCode 2.0, but 13% vs 30% on Terminal-Bench 4.0
- Priced at $0.30/$1.00 per 1M input/output tokens ($0.03 cached input), available first-party via Tinker at launch